{"composite_breakdown_label":"","computation_units":"Accreditation status","copyright":"","data_footnote":"","data_non_statistical":true,"data_notice_class":"","data_notice_heading":"","data_notice_text":"","data_show_map":false,"data_start_values":[],"embedded_feature_footer":"","embedded_feature_html":"","embedded_feature_tab_title":"","embedded_feature_title":"","embedded_feature_url":"","expected_disaggregations":[],"footer_fields":[],"graph_annotations":[],"graph_limits":[],"graph_series_breaks":[],"graph_stacked_disaggregation":"","graph_target_lines":[],"graph_title":"16.a.1. Existence of independent national human rights institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles, accreditation status (A, B, C)","graph_titles":[],"graph_type":"line","indicator_available":"Existence of independent national human rights institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles, accreditation status (A, B, C)","indicator_name":"Existence of independent national human rights institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles","indicator_number":"16.a.1","indicator_tabs:":{"override":false,"tab_1":"","tab_2":"","tab_3":"","tab_4":""},"national_geographical_coverage":"Republic of Moldova","page_content":"

***Non-statistical indicator***

Accreditation status:

Years 2023 \u2013 2028: Status A

Years 2018 - 2023: Status A

Years 2010 -2017: Status B

","permalink":"","placeholder":"","precision":[],"progress_status":"not_available","publications":[],"related_indicators":[],"reporting_status":"complete","sort":"","sources":[],"standalone":false,"tags":["Global","Non-statistical indicator"],"x_axis_label":"","ro":{"composite_breakdown_label":"","computation_units":"statut de acreditare","copyright":"","data_footnote":"","data_non_statistical":true,"data_notice_class":"","data_notice_heading":"","data_notice_text":"","data_show_map":false,"data_start_values":[],"embedded_feature_footer":"","embedded_feature_html":"","embedded_feature_tab_title":"","embedded_feature_title":"","embedded_feature_url":"","expected_disaggregations":[],"footer_fields":[],"graph_annotations":[],"graph_limits":[],"graph_series_breaks":[],"graph_stacked_disaggregation":"","graph_target_lines":[],"graph_title":"16.a.1. Existence of independent national human rights institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles, accreditation status (A, B, C)","graph_titles":[],"graph_type":"line","indicator_available":"Existence of independent national human rights institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles, accreditation status (A, B, C)","indicator_name":"Existence of independent national human rights institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles","indicator_number":"16.a.1","indicator_tabs:":{"override":false,"tab_1":"","tab_2":"","tab_3":"","tab_4":""},"national_geographical_coverage":"Republica Moldova","page_content":"

***Indicator non-statistic***

Statut de acreditare:

Anii 2023 \u2013 2028: Statutul A

Anii 2018 - 2023: Statutul A

Anii 2010 -2017: Statutul B

","permalink":"","placeholder":"","precision":[],"progress_status":"not_available","publications":[],"related_indicators":[],"reporting_status":"complete","sort":"","sources":[],"standalone":false,"tags":["Global","Indicator non-statistic"],"x_axis_label":"","SDG_INDICATOR__GLOBAL":"

Indicator 16.a.1: Existen\u021ba institu\u021biilor na\u021bionale independente pentru drepturile omului \u00een conformitate cu Principiile de la Paris

","SDG_TARGET__GLOBAL":"

Target 16.a: Consolidarea institu\u021biilor na\u021bionale relevante, inclusiv prin cooperarea interna\u021bional\u0103, pentru consolidarea capacit\u0103\u021bii la toate nivelurile, \u00een special \u00een \u021b\u0103rile \u00een curs de dezvoltare, pentru a preveni violen\u021ba, combate terorismul \u0219i criminalitatea

","META_LAST_UPDATE__GLOBAL":"","SDG_CUSTODIAN_AGENCIES__GLOBAL":"OHCHR","SDG_RELATED_INDICATORS__GLOBAL":"","SDG_INDICATOR_INFO":"","SDG_INDICATOR_INFO__GLOBAL":"","SDG_GOAL":"","target_id":"16.a","SDG_TARGET":"","GOAL_META_LINK":"https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-16-0A-01.pdf","GOAL_META_LINK_TEXT":"Metadatele indicatorului global (PDF)","SDG_INDICATOR":"

Indicator 16.a.1: Existen\u021ba institu\u021biilor na\u021bionale independente pentru drepturile omului \u00een conformitate cu Principiile de la Paris, statut de acreditare (A, B, C)

","SDG_SERIES_DESCR":"","META_LAST_UPDATE":"","SDG_RELATED_INDICATORS":"","CONTACT":"","CONTACT_ORGANISATION":"","CONTACT_NAME":"","ORGANISATION_UNIT":"","CONTACT_FUNCT":"","CONTACT_PHONE":"","CONTACT_MAIL":"","CONTACT_EMAIL":"","IND_DEF_CON_CLASS":"","STAT_CONC_DEF":"

\u0218ase modele de Institu\u021bii Na\u021bionale pentru Drepturile Omului exist\u0103 ast\u0103zi \u00een regiunile lumii, \u0219i anume: Comisii pentru drepturile omului, Institu\u021biile Ombudsmanului (Avocatului Poporului), Institu\u021bii hibrid, Organe consultative, Centre \u0219i institu\u021bii multiple. O Institu\u021bie Na\u021bional\u0103 pentru Drepturile Omului considerat\u0103 independent\u0103 este cea care are statutul de acreditare \u201enivelul A\u201d, \u00een conformitate cu Principiile de la Paris. Principiile Na\u021biunilor Unite de la Paris (adoptate \u00een anul 1993 de c\u0103tre Asambleea General\u0103 ONU), furnizeaz\u0103 standardele interna\u021bionale \u00een baza c\u0103rora institu\u021biile na\u021bionale pentru drepturile omului (INDO) pot fi acreditate de Alian\u021ba Global\u0103 a Institu\u021biilor Na\u021bionale pentru Drepturile Omului (GANHR). Procesul de acreditare este efectuat pentru evaluarea colegial\u0103 de c\u0103tre Subcomitetul pentru Acreditare (SCA) al (GANHR). Exist\u0103 trei tipuri posibile de acreditare:

A: \u00cen corespundere cu Principiile de la Paris

B: Statut de Observator \u2013 Nu este pe deplin \u00een corespundere cu Principiile de la Paris, sau nu a fost oferite suficiente informa\u021bii \u00eenc\u00e2t s\u0103 permit\u0103 o apreciere

C: Nu este \u00een conformitate cu Principiile de la Paris.

Datele sunt colectate anual de c\u0103tre Subcomitetului pentru Acreditare (SCA) al (GANHR) de la Oficiile Na\u021bionale ale Avocatului Poporului.

Din mai 2018 Oficiul Avocatului Poporului din Republica Moldova de\u021bine statutul de acreditare \u201e de nivelul A\u201d .

","UNIT_MEASURE":"statut de acreditare","CLASS_SYSTEM":"","SRC_TYPE_COLL_METHOD":"","SOURCE_TYPE":"

1) date administrative ale Oficiului Avocatului Poporului din Republica Moldova

2) date administrative ale [Subcomitetului pentru Acreditare (SCA) al (GANHR)](https://nhri.ohchr.org/EN/AboutUs/GANHRIAccreditation/Pages/default.aspx)

","COLL_METHOD":"","FREQ_COLL":"","REL_CAL_POLICY":"","DATA_SOURCE":"

1) Oficiul Avocatul Poporului

2) Subcomitetul pentru Acreditare (SCA) al (GANHR)

","COMPILING_ORG":"","INST_MANDATE":"Oficiul Avocatul Poporului","OTHER_METHOD":"","RATIONALE":"","REC_USE_LIM":"","DATA_COMP":"Indicatorul se refer\u0103 la statutul de acreditare, \u0219i anume: A, B sau C al Institu\u021biilor Na\u021bionale pentru Drepturile Omului.","DATA_VALIDATION":"","DOC_METHOD":"","QUALITY_MGMNT":"","QUALITY_ASSURE":"","QUALITY_ASSMNT":"","COVERAGE":"","COMPARABILITY":"","OTHER_DOC":"","national_data_updated_date":"","national_metadata_updated_date":"","un_designated_tier":"1","source_active_1":true,"source_organisation_1":"

1) Oficiul Avocatul Poporului

2) Subcomitetul pentru Acreditare (SCA) al (GANHR)

","source_periodicity_1":"anual","source_url_1":"","source_url_text_1":"Link la sursa de date","source_contact_1":"iuliana.cozma@ombudsman.md","source_other_info_1":""},"SDG_INDICATOR__GLOBAL":"

Indicator 16.a.1: Existence of independent national human rights institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles

","SDG_TARGET__GLOBAL":"

Target 16.a: Strengthen relevant national institutions, including through international cooperation, for building capacity at all levels, in particular in developing countries, to prevent violence and combat terrorism and crime

","META_LAST_UPDATE__GLOBAL":"2024-09-27","SDG_CUSTODIAN_AGENCIES__GLOBAL":"

United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

","SDG_RELATED_INDICATORS__GLOBAL":"

Indicator 10.3.1 / 16.b.1: Proportion of population reporting having personally felt discriminated against or harassed in the previous 12 months on the basis of a ground of discrimination prohibited under international human rights law

","SDG_INDICATOR_INFO":"","SDG_INDICATOR_INFO__GLOBAL":"","SDG_GOAL":"","target_id":"16.a","SDG_TARGET":"","GOAL_META_LINK":"https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-16-0A-01.pdf","GOAL_META_LINK_TEXT":"United Nations Sustainable Development Goals Metadata (PDF)","SDG_INDICATOR":"

Indicator 16.a.1: ce of independent national human rights institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles

","SDG_SERIES_DESCR":"","META_LAST_UPDATE":"","SDG_RELATED_INDICATORS":"","CONTACT":"","CONTACT_ORGANISATION":"","CONTACT_NAME":"","ORGANISATION_UNIT":"","CONTACT_FUNCT":"","CONTACT_PHONE":"","CONTACT_MAIL":"","CONTACT_EMAIL":"","IND_DEF_CON_CLASS":"","STAT_CONC_DEF":"

Six models of national human rights institutions exist today in the world regions and namely: Commissions for Human Rights, Ombudsman Institutions, Hybrid Institutions, Advisory Bodies, Multiple centres and institutions. A national human rights institution considered independent is the one that has the accreditation status of level A, in line with the Paris Principles. The UN Paris Principles (adopted in 1993 by the UN General Assembly), establishes the international standards based on which the national human rights institutions (NHRI) may be accredited by the Global Alliance of national human rights institutions (GANHR). The accreditation process is carried out through peer-to-peer assessment by the Sub-Committee for Accreditation (SCA) of the GANHR. There are three possible types of accreditations:

A: in line with Paris Principles

B: Observer Status \u2013 not fully in line with Paris Principles or no sufficient information was provided so as to allow an assessment

C: Not in line with Paris Principles.

Data are collected annually by the Sub-Committee for Accreditation (SCA) of GANHR from the National Ombudsman Offices.

Since May 2018, the Republic of Moldova Ombudsman Office acquired the accreditation status of level A.

","UNIT_MEASURE":"Accreditation status","CLASS_SYSTEM":"","SRC_TYPE_COLL_METHOD":"","SOURCE_TYPE":"

1) Administrative data of the Republic of Moldova People's Advocate Office

2) Administrative data of the [Sub-Committee for Accreditation (SCA) of GANHR](https://nhri.ohchr.org/EN/AboutUs/GANHRIAccreditation/Pages/default.aspx)

","COLL_METHOD":"","FREQ_COLL":"","REL_CAL_POLICY":"","DATA_SOURCE":"

1. People's Advocate Office

2. GANHRI Sub-Committee on Accreditation (SCA)

","COMPILING_ORG":"","INST_MANDATE":"People's Advocate Office","OTHER_METHOD":"","RATIONALE":"","REC_USE_LIM":"","DATA_COMP":"The indicator refers to the status of accreditation and namely: A, B or C of the national human rights institutions.","DATA_VALIDATION":"","DOC_METHOD":"","QUALITY_MGMNT":"","QUALITY_ASSURE":"","QUALITY_ASSMNT":"","COVERAGE":"","COMPARABILITY":"","OTHER_DOC":"","national_data_updated_date":"2026-07-14","national_metadata_updated_date":"2026-07-14","un_designated_tier":"1","source_active_1":true,"source_organisation_1":"

1. People's Advocate Office

2. GANHRI Sub-Committee on Accreditation (SCA)

","source_periodicity_1":"Annual","source_url_1":"","source_url_text_1":"Link to source","source_contact_1":"iuliana.cozma@ombudsman.md","source_other_info_1":"","SDG_GOAL__GLOBAL":"

Goal 16: Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels

","SDG_SERIES_DESCR__GLOBAL":"

SG_NHR_CMPLNC - Countries with National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (0 = No status; 1 = Status B, partially compliant; 2 = Status A, fully compliant) [16.a.1]

\n

SG_NHR_IMPL - Proportion of countries with independent National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (%) [16.a.1]

\n

SG_NHR_INTEXST - Proportion of countries that applied for accreditation as independent National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles [16.a.1]

","CONTACT_ORGANISATION__GLOBAL":"

United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

","STAT_CONC_DEF__GLOBAL":"

Definition:

\n

This indicator Existence of independent national human rights institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles measures the compliance of existing national human rights institutions with the Principles relating to the Status of National Institutions (The Paris Principles), which were adopted by the General Assembly (resolution 48/134) based on the rules of procedure of the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI), formerly the International Coordinating Committee of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights (or ICC).

\n

Concepts:

\n

A National Human Rights Institution (NHRI) is an independent administrative body set up by a State to promote and protect human rights. NHRIs are State bodies with a constitutional and/or legislative mandate to protect and promote human rights. They are part of the State apparatus and are funded by the State. However, they operate and function independently from government. While their specific mandate may vary, the general role of NHRIs is to address discrimination in all its forms, as well as to promote the protection of civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights. Core functions of NHRIs include complaint handling, human rights education and making recommendations on law reform. Effective NHRIs are an important link between government and civil society, in so far as they help bridge the 'protection gap' between the rights of individuals and the responsibilities of the State. Six models of NHRIs exist across all regions of the world today, namely: Human rights commissions, Human rights ombudsman institutions, Hybrid institutions, Consultative and advisory bodies, Institutes and centers and multiple institutions.

\n

To be effective in their work to promote and protect human rights, national human rights institutions must be credible and independent. The Paris Principles set out internationally agreed minimum standards that NHRIs must meet to be considered credible, requiring NHRIs to be independent in law, membership, operations, policy and control of resources.

\n

The Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI), through the Sub-Committee on Accreditation (SCA), is responsible for reviewing and accrediting NHRIs in compliance with the Paris Principles: NHRIs that are assessed as complying with the Paris Principles are accredited with ‘A status’, while those that partially comply are accredited with ‘B status’.

\n

‘A status’ NHRIs have independent participation rights at the UN Human Rights Council, its subsidiary bodies and some General Assembly bodies and mechanisms. They are eligible for full membership of GANHRI, including the right to vote and hold governance positions. NHRIs accredited with ‘B status’ participate in GANHRI meetings but are unable to vote or hold governance positions.

\n

Accreditation by the GANHRI entails a determination whether the NHRI is compliant, both in law and practice, with the Paris principles, the principal source of the normative standards for NHRIs, as well as with the General Observations developed by the SCA. Other international standards may also be taken into account by the SCA, including the provisions related to the establishment of national mechanisms in the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment as well as in the International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Likewise, the SCA looks at any NHRI-related recommendation from the international human rights mechanisms, notably, the Treaty Bodies, Universal Periodic Review (UPR) and special procedures. The process also looks into the effectiveness and level of engagement with international human rights systems.

\n

The Principles relating to the Status of National Institutions (The Paris Principles) adopted by General Assembly, Resolution 48/134 of 20 December 1993 provide the international benchmarks against which NHRIs can be accredited by the GANHRI.

","UNIT_MEASURE__GLOBAL":"

Percent (%)

\n

Number

","CLASS_SYSTEM__GLOBAL":"

Not applicable

","SOURCE_TYPE__GLOBAL":"

The main source of data on the indicator is administrative records of the Sub- Committee on Accreditation reports of the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI). OHCHR compiles the data into a global directory of National Human Rights Institution (NHRI) status accreditation updated every six months, after the Sub-committee on Accreditation submits its report.

","COLL_METHOD__GLOBAL":"

An international survey is sent to national human rights institution, which fill it in and send it back to the international mechanism. The latter also use complementary information, if available, received from civil society organizations.

\n

National human rights institutions seeking accreditation have to submit detailed information about their practices and how they directly promote compliance with the Paris Principles, namely the Principles relating to the Status of National Institutions that were adopted by the General Assembly (resolution 48/134). Information to be submitted relates to:

\n

1) Guarantee of tenure for members of the National Human Rights Institution decision-making body;

\n

2) full-time members of a National Human Rights Institution;

\n

3) Guarantee of functional immunity;

\n

4) Recruitment and retention of National Human Rights Institution staff;

\n

5) Staffing of the National Human Rights Institution by secondment;

\n

6) National Human Rights Institutions during the situation of a coup d’état or a state of emergency;

\n

7) Limitation of power of National Human Rights Institutions due to national security;

\n

8) Administrative regulation of National Human Rights Institutions;

\n

9) Assessing National Human Rights Institutions as National Preventive and National Monitoring Mechanisms;

\n

10) The quasi-judicial competency of National Human Rights Institutions (complaints-handling).

\n

Based on the information received, the process of accreditation is conducted through peer review by the Sub-Committee on Accreditation (SCA) of Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI).

","FREQ_COLL__GLOBAL":"

Every six months, following the report submitted by the Sub-committee on Accreditation.

","REL_CAL_POLICY__GLOBAL":"

Yearly

","DATA_SOURCE__GLOBAL":"

Name:

\n

National human rights institutions

\n

Description:

\n

National human rights institutions (e.g. national human rights commissions, human rights ombudsman institutions, hybrid institutions, consultative and advisory bodies, institutes and centers and multiple institutions)

","COMPILING_ORG__GLOBAL":"

United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and the Sub-Committee on Accreditation (SCA) of the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI).

","INST_MANDATE__GLOBAL":"

The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) acts as secretariat for the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI) and its Sub-Committee on Accreditation, on which the Office is a permanent observer. . As the international custodian of this indicator and with a global mandate to promote and protect human rights, OHCHR has the responsibility and mandated authority to collect, process, and disseminate statistics for this indicator.

","RATIONALE__GLOBAL":"

This indicator measures the global continual efforts of countries in setting up independent national institutions, through international cooperation, to promote inclusive, peaceful and accountable societies. The creation and fosterage of a National Human Rights Institution (NHRI) indicates a State’s commitment to promote and protect the human rights provided in international human rights instruments. Compliance with the Paris Principles vest NHRIs with a broad mandate, competence and power to investigate, report on the national human rights situation, and publicize human rights through information and education. While NHRIs are essentially state funded, they are to maintain independence and pluralism. When vested with a quasi-judicial competence, NHRIs handle complaints and assist victims in taking their cases to courts making them an essential component in the national human rights protection system. These fundamental functions that NHRIs play and their increasing participation in the international human rights fora make them important actors in the improvement of the human rights situation, including the elimination of discriminatory laws and the promotion and enforcement of non-discriminatory laws. At the national level reporting, the better the accreditation classification of the NHRI reflects that it is credible, legitimate, relevant and effective in promoting human rights at the national level.

","REC_USE_LIM__GLOBAL":"

The important and constructive role of national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights has been acknowledged in different United Nations instruments and resolutions, including the Final Document and Programme of Action of the 1993 World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna, GA resolutions A/RES/63/172 (2008) and A/RES/64/161 (2009) on National institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights. In addition, creation and strengthening of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) have also been encouraged. For example, the 1993 GA resolution 48/134 ‘affirms the priority that should be accorded to the development of appropriate arrangements at the national level to ensure the effective implementation of international human rights standards’ while the 2008 GA resolution A/RES/63/169 encouraged states ‘to consider the creation or the strengthening of independent and autonomous Ombudsman, mediator and other national human rights institutions’. The Human Rights Council (HRC resolution 5/1, 2007) also called for the effective participation of national human rights institutions in its institution building package, which provides elements to guide its future work.

\n

UN treaty bodies have also recognized the crucial role that NHRIs represent in the effective implementation of treaty obligations and encouraged their creation (e.g. CERD General Comment 17, A/48/18 (1993); CESCR General Comment 10, E/C.12/1998/25; and CRC General Comment 2, CRC/GC/2002/2). A compilation of various recommendations and concluding observations relevant to NHRIs emanating from the international human rights mechanisms in the United Nations is available at: http://www.universalhumanrightsindex.org/.

\n

The Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI) is an international association of NHRIs which promotes and strengthens NHRIs to be in accordance with the Paris Principles and provides leadership in the promotion and protection of human rights (ICC Statute, Art. 5). Decisions on the classifications of NHRIs are based on their submitted documents such as: 1) copy of legislation or other instrument by which it is established and empowered in its official or published format (e.g. statute, and /or constitutional provisions, and/or presidential decree, 2) outline of organizational structure including details of staff and annual budget, 3) copy of recent published annual report; 4) detailed statement showing how it complies with the Paris Principles. NHRIs that hold ‘A’ and ‘B’ status are reviewed every five years. Civil society organizations may also provide relevant information to OHCHR pertaining to any accreditation matter.

\n

Accreditation of NHRIs shows that the government supports human rights work in the country. However their effectiveness should also be measured based on their ability to gain public trust and the quality of their human rights work. In this context, it would also be worthwhile to look into the responses of the NHRI to the recommendations of the GANHRI. Likewise, the inputs from the NHRI while engaging with the international human rights mechanisms (i.e. submissions to the Human Rights Council, including UPR, and to the treaty bodies) represent a valuable source of information on how NHRIs carry out their mandate in reference to international human rights instruments.

","DATA_COMP__GLOBAL":"

In terms of method of computation, the indicator is computed as the accreditation classification, namely A (complying with the Paris Principles), or B (partially complying with the Paris Principles).

","DATA_VALIDATION__GLOBAL":"

Not applicable

","ADJUSTMENT__GLOBAL":"

Not applicable

","IMPUTATION__GLOBAL":"

• At country level

\n

All country data are available and there is no Treatment of missing values.

\n

• At regional and global levels

\n

All country data are available and there is no Treatment of missing values.

","REG_AGG__GLOBAL":"

Numbers and proportions of countries with independent National Human Rights Institutions in full and partial compliance with the Paris Principles are available per region.

","DOC_METHOD__GLOBAL":"

See ganhri.org/accreditation

","QUALITY_MGMNT__GLOBAL":"

Not applicable

","QUALITY_ASSURE__GLOBAL":"

Not applicable

","QUALITY_ASSMNT__GLOBAL":"

Not applicable

","COVERAGE__GLOBAL":"

Data availability:

\n

Data is available for all countries.

\n

Time series:

\n

Data available since 2000.

\n

Disaggregation:

\n

While disaggregation of information is not applicable for this indicator, it may be desirable to highlight the type of National Human Rights Institution (NHRI), whether Ombudsman, human rights commission, advisory body, research-based institute, etc.

","COMPARABILITY__GLOBAL":"

Sources of discrepancies:

\n

The country counterpart has the possibility to appeal the decision on the level of compliance with the Paris Principles received from the international mechanism. The appeal needs to be supported by at least 4 other national human rights institutions (all members of the international bureau) and 2 regional networks of national human rights institutions.

","OTHER_DOC__GLOBAL":"

URL:

\n

http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Indicators/Pages/HRIndicatorsIndex.aspx

\n

References:

\n

http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/HRIndicators/Metadata_16.a.1_3_March2016.pdf

\n

http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/StatusOfNationalInstitutions.aspx

\n

https://ganhri.org/accreditation/

","target_number":"16.a","goal_number":"16","indicator_sort_order":"16-0a-01"}