We have detected that you are using Internet Explorer to visit this website. Internet Explorer is now being phased out by Microsoft. As a result, this website no longer supports any version of Internet Explorer. Some features on this site will not work. You should use a modern browser such as Edge, Chrome, Firefox, or Safari. If you have difficulty installing or accessing a different browser, please contact your IT support team.
Indicator 16.a.1
Existence of independent national human rights institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles
Existence of independent national human rights institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles, accreditation status (A, B, C)
***Non-statistical indicator***
Accreditation status:
2010 - B
2011 - B
2012 - B
2013 - B
2014 - B
2015 - B
2016 - B
2017 - B
2018 - A
2019 - A
2020 - A
2021 - A
2022 - A
This table provides metadata for the actual indicator available from Moldovan statistics closest to the corresponding global SDG indicator. Please note that even when the global SDG indicator is fully available, this table should be consulted for information on national methodology and other Moldovan-specific metadata information.
Indicator
Indicator 16.a.1: ce of independent national human rights institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles
Definition and concepts
Six models of national human rights institutions exist today in the world regions and namely: Commissions for Human Rights, Ombudsman Institutions, Hybrid Institutions, Advisory Bodies, Multiple centres and institutions. A national human rights institution considered independent is the one that has the accreditation status of level A, in line with the Paris Principles. The UN Paris Principles (adopted in 1993 by the UN General Assembly), establishes the international standards based on which the national human rights institutions (NHRI) may be accredited by the Global Alliance of national human rights institutions (GANHR). The accreditation process is carried out through peer-to-peer assessment by the Sub-Committee for Accreditation (SCA) of the GANHR. There are three possible types of accreditations:
A: in line with Paris Principles
B: Observer Status – not fully in line with Paris Principles or no sufficient information was provided so as to allow an assessment
C: Not in line with Paris Principles.
Data are collected annually by the Sub-Committee for Accreditation (SCA) of GANHR from the National Ombudsman Offices.
Since May 2018, the Republic of Moldova Ombudsman Office acquired the accreditation status of level A.
Unit of measure
Accreditation status
Method of computation
The indicator refers to the status of accreditation and namely: A, B or C of the national human rights institutions.
Periodicity
Annual
Data last updated
Nov 26, 2024
Metadata last updated
Nov 26, 2024
This table provides information on metadata for SDG indicators as defined by the UN Statistical Commission. Complete global metadata is provided by the UN Statistics Division.
Indicator
Indicator 16.a.1: Existence of independent national human rights institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles
Target
Target 16.a: Strengthen relevant national institutions, including through international cooperation, for building capacity at all levels, in particular in developing countries, to prevent violence and combat terrorism and crime
United Nations Sustainable Development Goals Metadata (PDF)
International organisations(s) responsible for global monitoring
United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
Related indicators
Indicator 10.3.1 / 16.b.1: Proportion of population reporting having personally felt discriminated against or harassed in the previous 12 months on the basis of a ground of discrimination prohibited under international human rights law
Metadata update
2024-09-27
Source 1
Data sources
1) Administrative data of the Republic of Moldova People's Advocate Office
2) Administrative data of the [Sub-Committee for Accreditation (SCA) of GANHR](https://nhri.ohchr.org/EN/AboutUs/GANHRIAccreditation/Pages/default.aspx)
