Extent of use of country-owned results frameworks and planning tools by development cooperation providers

Sub-categories

Choose categories from the dropdowns below to see different breakdowns of the data. Some will not be available until a higher level is chosen.

Download headline data (.csv) Download source data (.csv)

Download source data for disaggregations (.csv)

Headline data

17.15.1. Extent of use of country-owned results frameworks and planning tools by development cooperation providers
Year Value
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025

Source: State Chancellary

Geographical Area: The Republic of Moldova, without the left side of the river Nistru and the municipality of Bender

Unit of Measurement: Percent, %

Footnote:

This table provides metadata for the actual indicator available from Moldovan statistics closest to the corresponding global SDG indicator. Please note that even when the global SDG indicator is fully available, this table should be consulted for information on national methodology and other Moldovan-specific metadata information.

Indicator

Indicator 17.15.1: Extent of use of country-owned results frameworks and planning tools by providers of development cooperation
Definition and concepts

The aim of the indicator is to try to see the general behaviour of the development partners in developing new intervention measures in the country, taking into account and observing the country’s priorities. According to the global metadata, the monitoring of this indicator is a voluntary process led by every country separately. The Government of the country leads and coordinates the collection and validation of data.
Unit of measure

Percent, %
Method of computation
<p>The indicator calculates the extent to which the objectives, results-based indicator and monitoring indicators related to the new development interventions are extracted from governmental sources, including: national, sector and local planning tools. For every significant development intervention (100.000 USD or more) approved during the year of reference, the following parameters are assessed:</p> <p> Q1. If the objectives are extracted from the results frameworks, government plans and strategies. where: </p> <p> 0, Objectives are not extracted from the results frameworks, plans and strategies implemented by the Government; 1, Objectives are extracted from results frameworks, plans and strategies implemented by the Government;</p> <p> Q2. Share of outcome (output) indicators which are extracted from the results frameworks, plans and strategies of the government, % </p> <p> where: Numerator (no): Number of outcome (output) indicators extracted from the results frameworks of the Government or other existing planning documents; Denominator (n): Total number of outcome (output) indicators included in the project’s results framework.</p> <p> Q3. Share of outcome (output) indicators which will be based on the data sources supplied by the existing monitoring systems in the country or by the national statistics services to trace the progress of the indicator %. Where: Numerator (ns): Number of outcome (output) indicators to be traced using the governmental statistics, the data sources or the Monitoring and Evaluation system (meaning sources that are not specific to the project); Denominator (n): Total number of outcome (output) indicators included from the project results’ framework.</p> <p> Aggregation of the indicator is carried out by mediating the three dimensions of the alignment with the national objectives and priorities of the new interventions in the year of reference. The aggregation will not consider the size of the project, so as to provide the same level of importance for the use level of the national framework of results and planning tools in medium and small projects. Otherwise, the weight depending on the size of the project will represent excessively the infrastructure projects and will sub-represent the interventions meant to influence the institutional policies and arrangements. The calculation formula for aggregation of the indicator are presented on page 28 of the following source</p>
Periodicity

Once every 2 years
Data last updated Jul 20, 2026
Metadata last updated Jul 20, 2026

This table provides information on metadata for SDG indicators as defined by the UN Statistical Commission. Complete global metadata is provided by the UN Statistics Division.

Indicator

Indicator 17.15.1: Extent of use of country-owned results frameworks and planning tools by providers of development cooperation
Target

Target 17.15: Respect each country’s policy space and leadership to establish and implement policies for poverty eradication and sustainable development
UN designated tier

2
Link to global metadata

https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-17-15-01.pdf
metadata_fields.goal_meta_link_text

United Nations Sustainable Development Goals Metadata (PDF)
International organisations(s) responsible for global monitoring

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
Related indicators

17.16.1 and 5.c.1
Metadata update

2024-09-27

Source 1

Data sources
<p>1) Public portal of the Foreign Assistance Management Platform of the Government</p> <p> 2) The Global Partnership’s monitoring framework</p>
Data producers

State Chancellary
Data providers

State Chancellary
Institutional mandate

State Chancellary
Link to data source Link to data source opens in a new window
Contact details
<p>Alina Bacinschi, Principal Consultant, Strategic Planning Department</p> <p>0 22 250 343, alina.bacinschi@gov.md</p>
Back to top